This is kind of old news, Michelin released their dinning guide to Tokyo a few months ago. Tokyo received 191 stars, more then New York and Paris combined.
The 5 judges spent a year and a half going to 1500 restaurants. That seems impressive until you realize they visited less then 1% of the restaurants in Tokyo. Tokyo has over 160,000 proper restaurants. I can't imagine what that number would be if you include bars and other places that serve food and very often it's damn good food. This isn't your standard American bar fare, for the most part. Indeed it's hard to get a bad meal here no matter where you go.
That number 160,000 just boggles the mind. If you went to two restaurants every day it would still take over 219 years to visit all of them. Reviewing 20% of them at four per page (8/double sided) would result in a 4000 page volume. Some say there are over 20,000 Italian restaurants in Tokyo. Paris has 20,000 restaurants total and New York has 23,000.
Tokyo is supposed to have quite a number of invitation only restaurants that of course didn't get reviewed either.
One Tokyo food critic said the guide confirmed what he has been saying. That Tokyo has very quality of food, but few real stand out restaurants. I think you'd have to live here a long time sampling food to agree with that. The overall quality here is so high from what I've had so far that a real standout might cause me to die from a foodgasm.
In some ways I agree with other chefs that refused to be in the guide because the thought of a rating, bragging that you are better, offended Japanese sensibilities. There is so much good food there is room to share. The idea of the Great Tokyo area's 34 million people descending on 150 restaurants kind of scares me, especially when you consider some of these restaurants don't seat more then 20 or 30 people. Maybe word of mouth is way to go here, although I think the city screams for a site like Yelp.com.